TheDallasCowboys

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 27 July 2007

The Good Samaritan

Posted on 15:59 by Unknown

(The following is an edited version of a sermon givin at Northaven Church on July 15th)


page9_blog_entry205_1

"Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?"
The expert in the law replied, "The one who had mercy on him."
Jesus told him, "Go and do likewise."

What new is there to say about
the parable of the Good Samaritan? It is, arguably, one of the foundational moral stories of our society. It has meaning, it holds a place of honor, even in non-religious circles.

So what new is there to say?

One of the truths I am continually relearning is:
truths I know like the back of my hand are often precisely the truths I need to re-hear again. We tend to take for granted that which is familiar. We tend to overlook the power of the familiar tale because we are so certain we know it already, have heard it before, and have digested every kernel of insight there is to savor.

Interestingly, that’s exactly how this parable starts. It starts with a man --a lawyer-- who believes he already knows everything he needs to know. The Bible calls this guy a lawyer, but that doesn’t mean he’s Board Certified in Intellectual Property. By calling him a lawyer, the Bible is telling you he’s a student of religious law; an expert in the Torah.

This lawyer comes to Jesus with a question. But here’s the catch: it’s a question he surely already knows the answer to. The question is

“What must I do to inherit eternal life?”

Jesus turns back to him, and says something like “Well, you’re the lawyer, you tell me.”

Immediately, the very proud and booksmart lawyer rolls out the exact chapter and verse. The complete codicil:

“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as yourself.”


This, of course, is the Great
Shema. The great law. The greatest commandment. And if the story of the Good Samaritan has become one of our culture’s best-loved moral teachings, the Great Commandment surely is even more important still. It stands as not only the greatest commandment in the Jewish tradition, but also the Christian tradition too:

Love God.
Love your neighbor.
Love yourself.

As Jesus points out in another place,
every other law, every other precept, every other moral teaching of the Bible, flows out of this first great commandment. Get this one right, and you get everything right. Get this one wrong, and it really doesn’t matter how many other rules you keep sacred.

See, the lawyer’s question was a softball pitch, and he slams his own question out of the park. (actually, have you
seen those college women pitch lately? Whew! They bring the heat..)

As an aside, there is no greater satisfaction than knowing you’ve gotten this kind of question right, yes? And yet, the terrible and wonderful thing --especially about law-- is that just because you
know the law, just because you are right about the law, doesn’t always mean you are...well.. “right.”

Dennise and I were talking about this recently, about how in the modern field of jurisprudence, often biggest courtroom conflagrations come from two sides of a conflict who are absolutely convinced they are right.

In fact, she reminded me of an expression lawyers tell each other. She reminded me that the expression I’m about to cite is not a blessing, but instead considered a curse. (It was actually first an old Yiddish curse. I looked it up.) It goes like this:

“May you be in a lawsuit in which you are in the right.”

There is often no more difficult position.
So this lawyer --who knows he’s right--- tries to surprise Jesus with another question. He asks Jesus,
“So, who is my neighbor?”

Interestingly, Jesus does not allow the lawyer another chance at an answer. You might imagine he would. After all, the lawyer is “one for one.” If he knew the great commandment, surely he knows where to turn in the code for the law on neighbors. He could look it up in the index. (“Neighbor; Who is my? Par. 142, Section 6).

But Jesus doesn’t give him the chance. Instead, to answer this question Jesus tells a story. It’s about a man who is traveling alone, down a road everybody knows was a dangerous road. Everybody hearing Jesus’ story that day would know this is a road that was always full of bandits.
Sure enough, Jesus says, bandits descend on the guy and they take all his money, and they leave him for dead. (And so, in the minds of many, maybe he even deserves the misfortune that befalls him...)

Soon after, a priest comes by. But he’s apparently on the way to something really important. So he passes by on the other side. Then, a Levite, another deeply religious person, passes by too.

(Notice, please, the clear critique that this parable offers of the "professionally religious." You know, ministers, rabbis, imams, priests. The parable is not too kind to these folks, more than insinuating that they are too busy with their lofty and heavenly pursuits to be bothered by real human suffering. I wish I could say things have changed since Jesus' day....)

At last, a Samaritan stops. He helps the guy. He helps the guy, and the guy ends up OK.

End of story, right? The “moral,” we assume, is that we should stop to help somebody by the side of the road, right? This surely
is one of the broad cultural meanings we take from this story. We even have so-called “Good Samaritan laws” designed to encourage such behavior. In the broad culture, we seem to believe this story is about stopping to render aid.

But, in fact, there is a whole additional layer of meaning. That layer gets added when Jesus tells us exactly who this good-deed-doer is. Jesus says the man who stops to render aid is a
Samaritan.

Now at this, everyone hearing Jesus tell the story that day would have collectively gasped. Because, you see, the word “Samaritan” was about the last word they would have expected Jesus to say.

The Samaritans and the Jews were sort of cultural and historical half cousins. And there are often no greater enemies than this. To the many Jews, Samaritans were half-breeds. They were remnants of the folks who did
not get taken into slavery by Assyria, way back in the 8th Century. The descendants of the folks who were enslaved eventually return to Israel, and come to believe that they to be the true Jewish people. The folks who got left behind become Samaritans. Some of them intermarry with other races. They worship at a different shrines. And they certainly hadn’t suffered like the Jews in exile had been forced to suffer.

So, when the Jews return, generations later, they find Samaritans still living in the Holy Land. And as the centuries pass, these groups grow to despise each other.

In fact, did you how catch at the end of the story the lawyer cannot even bring himself to mention the Samaritan’s identity?! Jesus has clearly identified three characters. They have helpful modifiers to distinguish them: Priest, Levite, Samaritan.

But when Jesus asks the guy at the end of the story: “Who is the neighbor?” the lawyer weakly croaks, “the one who showed mercy.”
He can’t bring himself to give the Samaritan the dignity of being the “good” in this story!!

What Jesus seems to be saying is that who your
neighbor is apparently depends upon who you are. You and your neighbor are not just any old two people. You and your neighbor are apparently two people who do not get along. Being a neighbor apparently means being a friend to your enemy, and allowing your enemy to assist you in your time of need.

The power of the story comes from realizing that Jesus says your enemy is also your neighbor too.

Imagine the various ways Jesus might tell this story today...

A Hasidic Jew was laying by the side of the road, and a Palestinian stops to help...

A son of the Confederacy was laying by the side of the road, and a Hip-Hop Rapper stops to help...

An American was laying by the side of the road, and a member of Al Quaida stops to help...

A fan of the 700 Club was laying by the side of the road, and a gay man stops to help...

A border-patrolling Minute Man was laying by the side of the road, and an undocumented immigrant stops to help...

After I preached this sermon, I got word that one of our church kids, Ethan, had added his own example to this list:
“A McDonald’s worker is laying by the side of the road, and a cow stops by to help...”


By jove, I think he’s got it!

You might be tempted to say,
“OK, Eric, but these examples are so terribly extreme. Those folks would never get along!!!”

Precisely!
And they are no more extreme than “Jew” and “Samaritan.” And that seems the point.

You see, the reality of this part of the Great Commandment --to love the neighbor-- is much more challenging than simply reciting a legal code. Who your neighbor is depends upon who you are. And loving your neighbor ultimately means not just loving the “generically hurt and wounded people” of the world. In fact, you might argue it has very little to do with stopping to help that old lady with her flat tire. Your neighbor may be the person who doesn't take care of him/herself, and ends up in the ditch by the side of the road. Yes, even those who deserve what they get, apparently their your neighbor too.

It means loving the people in the world you hate, and who hate you. Loving our neighbor means finding a sense of compassion and mercy, even for those who we feel deserve no compassion and mercy.

That’s not a rote law we can recite on cue.

But it is a powerful way of being that challenges even the best of us every day we live.

Read More
Posted in Angels and Pins, Because You Were an Alien (Immigration Issues) | No comments

Thursday, 26 July 2007

High School Heroes

Posted on 17:53 by Unknown

There is virtually no higher honor for a high school student than meeting the President of the United States. Only a select few kids ever get the chance. And, usually, it's a high school hero of some distinction: National Spelling Bee Winner, High School Football Champions, Boy Scout Troops.

Yesterday afternoon, it was a group of Presidential Scholars. The President had invited them to the White House to congratulate them on their award, and to use the occasion to reauthorize the "No Child Left Behind" act.

page9_blog_entry198_1
Presidential Scholars are smart kids. According to a Washington Post story this morning, it's a high honor that very few kids get:

"Each year the program selects one male and one female student from each state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Americans living abroad, 15 at-large students, and up to 20 students in the arts on the basis of outstanding scholarship, service, leadership and creativity."

Not only do these kids get to meet the President, but they also attend lectures and seminars all over Washington, with government officials and elected representatives, during the month of June.

These are smart kids.
These are bright kids.
These are the kind of kids that serve as vessels for our collective hopes and dreams for the future.

When the President met with 50-some of these kids yesterday, they handed him a handwritten letter. Apparently, it was a letter stating some of their heartfelt concerns.

Now even though these are smart kids, they're still kids. So you had to wonder: what
crucial issue would be on their minds and hearts, compelling them to speak to the President directly about it?

Were they requesting presidential pardon for Paris Hilton?
Suggesting Ludacris tunes for his iPod?
Offering him a Haiku about Sanjaya?

Nope. None of these. Instead, the handwritten note implored the President to uphold the Geneva Conventions.

The concern on these high school kid's hearts was torture; and told the President that they
"believe we have a responsibility to voice our convictions."

Here's a part of their letter:

"We do not want America to represent torture. We urge you to do all in your power to stop violations of the human rights of detainees, to cease illegal renditions, and to apply the Geneva Convention to all detainees, including those designated enemy combatants..."

I can promise you what you will hear in the media today. On right-wing-talk-radio, you will hear that these kids ambushed the President. They will call it disgraceful that these kids took an innocent and non-political event, and injected politics into it.

But, of course, they did nothing of the sort.

It was, in fact, the
President's staff who was atttempted to use them as window dressing at the reauthorization of "No Child Left Behind." His staff put politics into it. They just chose to speak their mind too.

We'll probably also hear that not all of the President Scholars signed on to this letter.

I am sure this is the case. In any group of smart, free-thinking kids, there will be those who choose not to go with the group.

But neither of these is the thing I will remember from this story.

What I will remember is the courage it took for these high school kids --who were guests in the White House-- to speak out boldly about what they believe.

The power differential between a high school kid and the President of the United States is pretty vast. The possibility of retaliation by others, or the loss of career opportunities, is real. They had no power to wield, and everything to lose. Given this, the pressure to stand quietly, smile meekly, take pics for your MySpace page, and then just go home, must have been intense.

But they didn't do that. They did much more than that. They chose to speak their "truth" to the most powerful "power" in the world.

And whether you agree with them or disagree with them, you have to admit that it takes a lot of courage to do what they did.

And for this, I'd have to say that these are smart kids. They give me some hope about the future.

They are real high school heroes.
Read More
Posted in Balcony People | No comments

Wednesday, 25 July 2007

Data Errata

Posted on 16:00 by Unknown
I am proud to say that I made a mistake in this entry from a week ago.

Well, technically, it wasn't really a mistake. It was just information I didn't know yet. What I didn't know when I wrote you was that there was an anonymous donor at the Walnut Hill show. He/she (they're anonymous...) chose to double the total amount we raised that night for the Nothing But Nets campaign.

That means that we actually raised $3,668.00!!!

Wow!

That's the second Connections show to raise $4K because of the generosity of anonymous donors.

And, that means that, to date, Connections has raised more than $14,000.00 for various charitable causes.

I proud to be able to tell you this, and proud that I was "wrong" before.

Thanks again to all those who come to our shows. On behalf of the whole band, it's an honor to play for you.
Read More
Posted in Music News | No comments

Friday, 20 July 2007

Digital Download Data

Posted on 16:01 by Unknown

The other day I compiled some data on online digital downloads of my first CD. (I did this last year too...just updating...) This is data from companies that are actually selling my music online right now. I thought you might be interested to see which songs were most popular.

I was actually a bit surprised how it came out. I would have never guessed the top two were actually the top two. And "Mom Went Bungie Jumping" appears to be the leader by a mile. Take a look for yourself:

Mom Went Bungie Jumping: 169
Voices: 83
I Will Sing: 57
Sequoyah: 43
The Birches of Moscow: 39
My Brontosaurus Threw a Potluck: 35
Deep Blue Grey: 30
The Peace: 27
The Road Goes On: 26
Your Warm: 25
Sun is Gonna Show: 24
Song from the Spring: 19
These Rooms: 13

(numbers indicate the total times a song has been downloaded/streamed)

If you want to hear a clip,
click here to go to playlist at iTunes with these songs in this same rank of popularity.

Of course, these numbers don't reflect "free" downloads or streams from other websites, such as this one, or from places like
MySpace. The truth is, my most popular download of all-time is "Prairie Chapel Road," which has now been given away more than 3,000 times. And "The Natural Thing" has more than 1,000 streams on MySpace.

But I was curious to see what folks were buying, and so there you have it. Interesting...fascinating really...to see where folks are putting their money.

BTW, you might assume all this downloading has brought in serious cash for me, yes? You'd be wrong. Total amount I've been paid for all these digital downloads?

About $55 bucks.

I've said this before, but it bears repeating here....where you choose to buy your online music makes a
huge difference to actual artists. And the major company that --far and away-- leads the other digital media companies, in terms of being "artist friendly?"

iTunes.

page9_blog_entry203_1

Yep. That's right.

Sure, I'm predisposed to like them. And yes, I'm totally biased in my view of their company. But facts is facts. iTunes is the most "artist friendly" major digital distributor. It's not even close. They pay artists more than ten times per song than some of the other major retailers.

In fact, of the sales listed above, Apple's iTunes accounts for a mere one-quarter of all the downloads, but a whopping three-quarters of the money paid out!

Which allows me to remind you, as the flight attendants say, "We know you have a choice when you buy online, so
thank you for choosing iTunes."

sidebarbarleft
Sign up to get each new blog entry sent to you via email.
The posts come with all pics, links, and other formatting included.
Click here to find out how to sign up.

Read More
Posted in Music News | No comments

Wednesday, 18 July 2007

"Connecting" to Nothing But Nets (thanks, Walnut Hill!)

Posted on 16:02 by Unknown

Connections played another show this past Sunday night. We were at Walnut Hill UMC, as a part of their summer Sunday night series. About 150 folks showed up and it turned out to be yet another great show.

The band's played enough together now that we had a certain...uh...connection with each other that night. It was a fun night.

Best of all, we raised a heck of a lot for another good cause. The good folks at Walnut Hill suggested a new beneficiary for this show, and we agreed. It's called the "
Nothing But Nets" campaign. When all the cash is counted, we'll probably exceed $2,000 raised for this great cause

Nothing But Net is a campaign to eradicate malaria in African countries. The idea is that that a simple mosquito net with a mild insecticide can actually help prevent the spread of this killer disease.

The movement was inspired by a short essay that ran in Sports Illustrated
some time back. Folks associated with the NBA heard about it, and thus the name. As I understand it, many NBA stars have adopted this as a non-profit that they support. It's grown to where it's officially a United Nations program, and the United Methodist Church is now a sponsor.

Studies show that someone in infected with malaria every 30 seconds. These nets can last a family up to four years, as I understand it, and they reduce the likelihood of transmission 90 percent!
page9_blog_entry202_1
The NBN website reminds us all that the conflict in Darfur continues unabated. There are many refugees from the conflict how living in Chad, and the "rainy season" is coming soon. Estimates are that 25 percent more refugees could die this year from malaria than last.

One net can be furnished to a family for a simple $10 contribution.

So, it looks like we may have helped save more than 200 people's lives on Sunday night.

That puts it in some pretty sharp relief, no?

So, many thanks to the good folks at Walnut Hill. You all were very kind in your compliments of the band afterwards. We did a mix of Chicago, Eagles, and Fogelberg,. All in all, a good time was had by all.

Oh yeah...you know, you could send a net too. Just
click here to do it right now.

Read More
Posted in Music News | No comments

Friday, 13 July 2007

Just So We're Clear...

Posted on 17:52 by Unknown
There is a guy who, in the coming weeks, will break one of baseball's most hallowed records. I wrote about him before in a blog entry you can still find here.

The closer we get to the date he will break that record, the less I am paying attention. I am turning off media reports that mention his name. (Note how I haven't mentioned it here...) Truthfully, I'm really not paying attention to baseball news at all right now, and part of it is precisely because I don't want to hear one word about this guy.

I don't want to know how close he is to the record right now (I am pleased to say that at this moment, I really
do not know...) and I hope to not hear about it on the day he "breaks" it.

As I wrote before, he doesn't deserve the honor, the attention, or the accolades. I felt that when I wrote before, and nothing has changed about my feelings since.

As I understand, he stands a good chance of being booed on that day he "breaks" the record. Were I in the crowd that day --and I would hope as many people as possible will just stay home-- I'd try to boo louder than anyone.

So undeserving is he of this honor, such a great travesty of baseball history his "record" will be, that I hope to never mention his name again.

Therefore, when I fail to say a word about it down the road, please do not misinterpret my silence as forgetfulness or even tacit approval. I am not
accidentally ignorant to this story, I am intentionally so.

Just so we're clear.
Read More
Posted in HSOs from a Bitter P1 | No comments

Style vs. Substance

Posted on 17:50 by Unknown
For years, we Americans have enjoyed a love-hate relationship with our television news anchors. We trust them to frame the issues of the day and present us with a snapshot of the world as it is. (Or, at least, the world as they see it...)

We turn to them again and again in moments of crisis, for information, comfort, and a communal connection with others. In fact, in times of crisis you could argue that TV news anchors draw millions of us together in a way that no other media source --no one else anywhere, really-- can.

But the unspoken underbelly of TV news anchors is that they not only have to be sharp and professional journalists, but they also have to be easy on the eye. I am
not saying I believe this to be fair. I am saying that if you asked 100 journalists about it, the vast majority would give you Walter Cronkite's answer: It's just "the way it is."

The movie "
Broadcast News" famously brought this truth to the big screen. It pitted the characters of William Hurt and Albert Brooks against each other. In the film, Hurt plays a "pretty boy" who knows virtually nothing of journalism, but somehow manages to ascend to "the chair," as the lead anchor of a network news show. Brooks plays an intelligent, well trained, but far-too-self-aware, journeyman reporter who knows the world, knows his profession, and knows that none that matters in a world where style so often trumps substance.

At the end of the movie, Brooks walks away from the insanely-manic pace of the network newsroom, content to live out his days as a local reporter for a Seattle affiliate. Hurt, the pretty boy, becomes a broadcast news institution.

Of course, there is an even deeper, and crasser, level to this "style vs substance" dynamic. The deeper level is the unfair double standard concerning women and men on TV news.

Yes, men are
mostly expected to be "pretty boys." But some of them aren't. Cronkite was a lovable grandfather. Koppel looked vaguely like Alfred E. Newman. Guys can get away that, so long as we believe them to be consummate journalistic professionals.

Women cannot. They are not only expected to be consummate professionals, but they are also expected to be...well..."Babes."

Even with his grandfatherly countenance, Cronkite might still be able to chair the CBS News today. He knows the world, he knows the news. It doesn't
matter how he looks. Katie Couric not only has to know the world and know the news, but she has to look "pretty" doing it too.

Again, I'm not saying this is fair or right. In fact, it's more than a little sick, and really quite sexist.

But leave it to FOX to push this envelope as far as it will go. FOX --the network that gave a whole new meaning to "style over substance"-- is in the process of editing a new reality show
called "Anchorwoman."

The premise of the show places a woman, whose only credentials appear to be that she is a "babe," in the anchor chair of a Tyler Texas newsroom. The woman, Lauren Jones, is a former swimsuit model and pro-wrestling...ahem..."personality." She has ZERO training as a journalist. She has ZERO
experience as a journalist.

But for reasons still unclear to me, a Tyler TV station allowed FOX to insert her into their staff, and even gave her the "chair" as coanchor of their local evening news. Then, they allowed FOX to follow her --and the rest of their staff- around with cameras, to see just what kind of wacky, oddball, hilarity might ensue.

Here is a Good Morning America clip that talks about Ms. Jones, the Tyler station, and the ethical issues involved:



Let me say --and I hope you all noted-- that the brief GMA clip of the "average" Tyler "woman on the street" indicates that she's really embarrassed by this whole episode. Many of us here in Texas are. This is
FOX thing, not a Texas thing. Please keep that in mind. (Please?)

And the thing that gets me about all this is not that FOX came up with this idea. I expect that from
them. They're FOX. What really gets me is the choice of this TV station to play along.

Why in the
heck did the editors at this station (A CBS affiliate, btw...) allow this?! Do they really see their newsroom as nothing more than a playground for some crass cultural experiment? Isn't it still a real newsroom? Aren't there some standards of journalistic professionalism that need to be embraced and held sacred?

Or, have we really come to a place where
style does trump substance, and such things just don't matter anymore?

After all, since all the customer sees is the image of a body in a chair, maybe looking good really
is all that matters. Maybe any old good-looking body can do it.

Since most of the TV news appears to be
about Paris Hilton, maybe it's just the natural evolution of things to have the news read by Paris Hilton.

Hey....speaking Paris Hilton...

No...really....

You see, into this sorry state of affairs comes a real TV anchorwoman who gives me the hope that substance isn't quite dead yet.

Mika Brzezinski --daughter of former Carter cabinet member, Zbigniew-- is a respectable journalist with MSNBC. Several weeks ago now, she did something on MSNBC's new morning show, "
Morning Joe," that caused quite a stir in the journalistic world.

Brzezinski's task was to provide short, top-of-the-hour, news breaks on the show hosted by Joe Scarborough. But on this day, she decided she would not "lead" with a yet another story about Paris Hilton.

Apparently, she actually believed there were others stories more deserving of the lead position that morning. You know, like maybe the war? Maybe...I don't know...the Attorney General scandal? Maybe the key Republican Senator who, that very morning, had announced his break with the President on the issue of the war, and his newly found support for bringing the troops home now?

Gee, maybe, she thought,
one of those is the real lead story of the day.

But no. Her editors gave her yet another in the endless cycle of trivial and vacuous Paris Hilton stories. That was to be her lead.

But on this particular morning, something in Mika Brzezinski snapped. For three successive "news breaks" that morning, she refused to follow the instructions of her bosses. She wouldn't do the story on Paris Hilton. She and the other on-air personalities treat it with a sense of humor. They joke about it. But you can also sense a very real frustration simmering in her, just below the surface.

Take a look:



People seem to be captured by, and enamored with, this small "protest" by Brzezinski. In fact, 2.8
million people have watched the above clip on YouTube. That is HUGE.

And, she has become something of a celebrity among her fellow journalists, and folks like me, who are cheered by her actions. In
an AP story after-the-fact, Brzezinski says this:

"I could not get through the first three words without crumbling. My skin was crawling. This was our lead? On a day like this?"

And as for the positive reaction to her little on-air-protest, she offers up this thought:

"Among journalists it touched a nerve because I think we’re tired of pretending this is important. We also know that, deep down inside, our viewers know that we don’t believe this is news. They can’t. They can’t think we’re that dumb."


Indeed!

Happily, her MSNBC bosses have actually seen fit to give her the "chair" on a new hour-long morning news show. And I will point out that, in the past few weeks, the rest of the media seems to finally have gotten the hint that nobody's all that concerned about Paris Hilton.

Thank God.
-----------------------------------

On
his show, Keith Olbermann used to introduce Paris-Hilton-like stories with the tag line "another story my producers are making me cover." He would say it in jest. But you also always hoped he really believed it too.

Mika Brzezinski reminded us that he's not alone. She reminded us that perhaps it
does matter who sits in "the chair." A bimbo is probably never going to "get" that a story about a bimbo is not a lead story. A swimsuit model is probably never going to grasp that it's really not even news at all. And a wrestling "personality" is probably never going to have the guts to stand up to her editors on live national television.

Hopefully, now and then, a journalist will.

And hopefully, now and then, we'll continue to be reminded that, in the end, substance still
does matter.
Read More
Posted in Thoughts from Purple Land | No comments

Tuesday, 10 July 2007

Sequoyah Unplugged: A Songwriter Retreat, August 17-19

Posted on 15:57 by Unknown
This announcement is mainly for my songwriting/ performing friends on this list. Feel free to pass this along to anyone who might be interested....

I'm honored to be a part of what we hope will become an annual event at the Mount Sequoyah Retreat Center in Fayetteville, Arkansas. The event is called "Sequoyah Unplugged: A Singer-Songwriter Retreat." It's scheduled for August 17-18.

Trout Fishing in America will be the feature performers, and also teach a workshop, as will Efron White and Emily Kaitz. My old friend, Charles Gaby, will also be a workshop leader.

The entire weekend is intended to be a time of retreat and renewal for songwriters and performers, and to explore the idea of songwriting as spiritual practice. Although it's being held at a United Methodist center, and several Methodist will have leadership, it will not be sectarian in nature, and the hope is that any songwriter interested in the cross-section of spirit and writing will want to attend.

You may recall me blogging about this place before. Sequoyah is a beautiful and relaxing retreat center, just on the edge of the city, atop the "mountain" of the same name.

I will be leading/organizing a nightly "song circle" time for anyone who wants to share their gift, and I'll serve as a host for the weekend.

If you want more info, you can
download a brochure from this link.

I hope some of you might consider going.
Read More
Posted in Music News | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • A New Song: I Wish You Could Cry
    A new song I wrote over the past couple of weeks. Hope you like it. Lyrics below... I Wish You Could Cry What if I could promise you A net t...
  • A Love Song That's True
    Been hearing a lot of folks complaining about Valentine's Day this year. Right there with you, friends. Here's a song I wrote a few ...
  • My Predictions
    In ten minutes, it will be election day here. They've already voted in Dixville Knox, and soon will be elsewhere. As somebody who loves ...
  • Circle Concert Series: Saturday, February 20th
    I'm pleased to let you know that I'll be playing a show tomorrow night of my own, yes my own, music. For a multitude of reasons, tha...
  • My Interview on Lambda Weekly
    Last Wednesday, I was honored to be the guest on the "Lambda Weekly" Radio Program on KNON in Dallas. Lambda Weekly is the longe...
  • James Taylor/Carole King Show- March 7th
    Hey Everybody: We've got a great Connections Band show coming up weekend after this.... James Taylor/Carole King Tribute Show FUMC Coppe...
  • Daily Grat: Wine
    Today's daily gratitude is wine. "Wine is constant proof that God loves us and loves to see us happy." -- Benjamin Franklin We...
  • Fear is a Liar
    It's been quite a jarring week in the news. Boston. Ricin Letters to the President. Kaufman County. The explosion in West, Texas. Floodi...
  • Your Prayers and Happy Thoughts, Please.
    The Judge will be going into a Presbyterian Hospital on Wednesday, for surgery to remove an ovarian cyst. ...
  • Non-Violent "action" at General Conference
    As I alluded to briefly , earlier this week the General Conference of the United ...

Categories

  • Angels and Pins (134)
  • Balcony People (28)
  • Because You Were an Alien (Immigration Issues) (10)
  • blogging (16)
  • Connections News (17)
  • Favorite Entries (35)
  • Folkerth on Fogelberg (8)
  • Friends I'm Proud to Know (7)
  • HSOs from a Bitter P1 (22)
  • In the interest of self disclosure (11)
  • Inside Baseball for Methodists (23)
  • Kerrville (2)
  • Life Happens (74)
  • Music News (33)
  • My Daily Gratitude (52)
  • My Music (34)
  • My Own Amazing Race (6)
  • Northaven (15)
  • Poetry In Motion (14)
  • Reconciling Filings (12)
  • Show Info (16)
  • Synapse Clippings (8)
  • Things to Like About Texas (7)
  • Thoughts from Purple Land (81)
  • Word of the Day (2)
  • Worth Repeating (32)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (39)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (52)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2011 (76)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2010 (86)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (22)
    • ►  February (32)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2009 (68)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ►  2008 (76)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (9)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  January (8)
  • ▼  2007 (66)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ▼  July (8)
      • The Good Samaritan
      • High School Heroes
      • Data Errata
      • Digital Download Data
      • "Connecting" to Nothing But Nets (thanks, Walnut H...
      • Just So We're Clear...
      • Style vs. Substance
      • Sequoyah Unplugged: A Songwriter Retreat, August 1...
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2006 (37)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile